{"id":1622,"date":"2020-05-01T18:49:39","date_gmt":"2020-05-01T18:49:39","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"-0001-11-30T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"-0001-11-29T22:00:00","slug":"","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/typo.uni-konstanz.de\/rara\/universals-archive\/1622\/","title":{"rendered":"Universal 1618: Edible: Manner of Ingestion, State of Food;
Nonedible : Value, Purpose\/Function"},"content":{"rendered":"

Universal 1618: Edible: Manner of Ingestion, State of Food;
Nonedible : Value, Purpose\/Function<\/h3>\n
\n
Original<\/dt>\n
The implicational hierarchy of semantic distinctions for possessive classifier systems:
The primary distinction in possessive classifier systems is between edible and other possessed items.
Edibles are secondarily divided into edible vs. potable;
a tertiary categorization can be based on manner of eating (edible, potable, chewable, etc.): Manner of Ingestion > State of food.
The first distinction to appear with nonedibles is valued vs. nonvalued possession;
further distinctions are made according to how the possessed item is intended to be used:
shelter, vehicle, clothing, body ornaments, mats, etc.: Value > Purpose\/Function.<\/dd>\n
Standardized<\/dt>\n
IF there are classifiers for edible possessed items, THEN there are for nonedible ones, and vice versa.
For the edible class:
IF a possessive classifier system distinguishes objects by state of food, THEN it also distinguishes them by manner of ingestion. <\/p>\n

For the nonedible class:
IF a possessive classifier system distinguishes objects by purpose or function, THEN it also distinguishes them by value. <\/dd>\n

Keywords<\/dt>\n
possessive classifier<\/dd>\n
Domain<\/dt>\n
inflection, syntax, semantics<\/dd>\n
Type<\/dt>\n
implication<\/dd>\n
Status<\/dt>\n
achronic<\/dd>\n
Quality<\/dt>\n
absolute?<\/dd>\n
Basis<\/dt>\n
classifier languages and relevant literature analyzed by Croft 1994<\/a><\/dd>\n
Source<\/dt>\n
Croft 1994<\/a>: 155, based on the research on Oceanic classifiers by Lichtenberk 1983<\/a><\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n
\n
Counterexamples<\/dt>\n
<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Universal 1618: Edible: Manner of Ingestion, State of Food;Nonedible : Value, Purpose\/Function Original The implicational hierarchy of semantic distinctions for possessive classifier systems: The primary…<\/p>\n

Read moreUniversal 1618: Edible: Manner of Ingestion, State of Food;<br>Nonedible : Value, Purpose\/Function<\/span><\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[346],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1622","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-universals-archive","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/typo.uni-konstanz.de\/rara\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1622","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/typo.uni-konstanz.de\/rara\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/typo.uni-konstanz.de\/rara\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/typo.uni-konstanz.de\/rara\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/typo.uni-konstanz.de\/rara\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1622"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/typo.uni-konstanz.de\/rara\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1622\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/typo.uni-konstanz.de\/rara\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1622"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/typo.uni-konstanz.de\/rara\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1622"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/typo.uni-konstanz.de\/rara\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1622"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}