Skip to content

Universal 1096:

Posted in Universals Archive

Universal 1096:

Original
There is an overall distinction between Type A and B languages, with the following correlations (i.e. mutual implications) of opposite properties defining the two types:

See Graphics

Standardized
(holistic) Type A vs. Type B
Keywords
nasal vowel, syllable, order, attributive, adjective, noun, prefix, suffix, preposition, postposition, serial verb, number, compounding, consonant, agreement, subject
Domain
phonology, morphology, syntax
Type
mutual implication
Status
achronic
Quality
statistical
Basis
a range of languages of Sub-Saharan Africa (Type A: West Atlantic, Bantu, Hausa, Niger-Congo; Type B: Mande, Kwa, possibly Voltaic (although there are several Type A features))
Source
Houis 1970: 59-67
Counterexamples
Yoruba (Defoid, Benue-Congo): Type B in terms of (a), (b), Type A in terms of (c), (d).Commercial Sango (Adamawa-Ubangi, Niger-Congo): Type A features: (i), (c), (d), (j); Type B features: (a), (b).Sara (Central Sudanic, Chari-Nile, Nilo-Saharan): some dialects more like Type A , others more like Type B.

One Comment

  1. FP
    FP

    Apparently, correlations are only intended to be valid for Sub-Saharan African languages, rather than universally.

    1. May 2020

Comments are closed.