Skip to content

Universal 1193:

Posted in Universals Archive

Universal 1193:

Original
If the head of a restrictive relative clause does function as the subject of the restricting clause then no personal pronoun will be present in the subject of the restricting clause.
Standardized
IF the head of a restrictive relative clause functions as the subject of the restricting clause, THEN no personal pronoun will be present in the subject of the restricting clause.
Keywords
restrictive relative clause, subject, personal pronoun, head
Domain
syntax
Type
implication
Status
achronic
Quality
absolute?
Basis
languages in Keenan 1974
Source
Keenan 1974: 305
Counterexamples

One Comment

  1. FP
    FP

    Yet the one major position in which personal pronouns are not present is the subject position of the main verb of the restricting clause. Hausa (Chadic, Afro-Asiatic), Yoruba (Defoid, Benue-Congo), and Urhobo (Edoid, Benue-Congo; related to Yoruba) would appear to be counterexamples to this claim. However, in Keenan & Comrie 1977 [1972], it is argued that the subject pronouns present in the restricting clause is simply a verb agreement which cooccurs with full NP subjects in simplex sentences, and so does not count as as independently determinable subject.

    1. May 2020

Comments are closed.