If in a language there is a pronominal form denoting the trial of the metapersons ‘hearer’ and ‘hearer(s) + non-participant(s)’ and/or the trial of ‘non-participant’, then there is a pronominal form denoting the trial of the metapersons ‘speaker + hearer(s)’, ‘speaker + hearer + non-participant’ and/or ‘speaker + non-participant(s)’.
Standardized
IF there is a pronominal form denoting the trial of the metapersons ‘hearer’ and ‘hearer(s) + non-participant(s)’ and/or the trial of ‘non-participant’, THEN there is a pronominal form denoting the trial of the metapersons ‘speaker + hearer(s)’, ‘speaker + hearer + non-participant’ and/or ‘speaker + non-participant(s)’.
Keywords
personal pronoun, person, 2nd, hearer, speaker, non-participant, number, trial
Domain
inflection, syntax, lexicon
Type
implication
Status
achronic
Quality
absolute
Basis
400 world-wide distributed languages, see Sokolovskaja 1980: 98-99; Sokolovskaja surveyed systems of independent personal pronouns only.
1. Sokolovskaja recognizes the following metapersons:’speaker’, ‘hearer’, ‘non-participant’, ‘speaker + hearer(s)’, ‘speaker + non-participant(s)’, ‘hearer + non-participant(s)’, and ‘speaker + hearer(s) + non-participant(s). 2. The reverse is not true at least for Kele (NW Bantu, Niger-Congo) and Kunimaipa (Trans-New Guinea).
1. Sokolovskaja recognizes the following metapersons:’speaker’, ‘hearer’, ‘non-participant’, ‘speaker + hearer(s)’, ‘speaker + non-participant(s)’, ‘hearer + non-participant(s)’, and ‘speaker + hearer(s) + non-participant(s). 2. The reverse is not true at least for Kele (NW Bantu, Niger-Congo) and Kunimaipa (Trans-New Guinea).