Universal 1498:
- Original
- A hierarchy of grammaticalization from verb to complementizer to adverbial conjunction.
If a language uses the morpheme at a given level on the hierarchy, it will use it at all the previous levels:
1. quotative particle;
2. quotative/complementizer with ‘say’;
3. quotative/complementizer with ‘know’;
4. quotative/complementizer with ‘believe’;
5. quotative/complementizer with ‘hope’;
6. conjunction with purpose clause;
7. conjunction with reason clause;
8. marker with question word;
9. complementizer with embedded question;
10. conjunction with conditional clause;
11. comparative marker. - Standardized
- IF a de-verbal morpheme is used as a comparative marker, THEN it is also used as a conjunction with conditional clause.
IF a de-verbal morpheme is used as a conjunction with conditional clause, THEN it is also used as a complementizer with embedded question.
IF a de-verbal morpheme is used as a complementizer with embedded question, THEN it is also used as a marker with question word.
IF a de-verbal morpheme is used as a marker with question word, THEN it is also used as a conjunction with reason clause.
IF a de-verbal morpheme is used as a conjunction with reason clause, THEN it is also used as a conjunction with purpose clause.
IF a de-verbal morpheme is used as a conjunction with purpose clause, THEN it is also used as a quotative/complementizer with ‘hope’.
IF a de-verbal morpheme is used as a quotative/complementizer with ‘hope’, THEN it is also used as a quotative/complementizer with ‘believe’.
IF a de-verbal morpheme is used as a quotative/complementizer with ‘believe’, THEN it is also use as a quotative/complementizer with ‘know’.
IF a de-verbal morpheme is used as a quotative/complementizer with ‘know’, THEN it is also used as a quotative/complementizer with ‘say’.
IF a de-verbal morpheme is used as a quotative/complementizer with ‘say’, THEN it is also used as a quotative particle. - Keywords
- grammaticalization, verb, complementizer, adverbial conjunction
- Domain
- morphology
- Type
- implicational hierarchy
- Status
- diachronic
- Quality
- statistical
- Basis
- 38 languages surveyed by Saxena 1988
- Source
- Saxena 1988, cited after Lord 1993: 210-211
- Counterexamples
Saxena finds out that Givon’s (1980) sorting of verb meanings:say, tell (that) < think, know, believe < decide (that), agree (that) < hope, remember < want (to) constitutes an implicational hierarchy which the languages she has surveyed tend to follow in general with respect to the verbs which allow the complementizer. (Lord 1993: 211)