Skip to content

Universal 1602: nasal, voice, prenasalized stop, sonorant

Posted in Universals Archive

Universal 1602: nasal, voice, prenasalized stop, sonorant

Original
Languages that manifest the dependency of nasality on voicing normally have prenasalized stops.
Standardized
IF the feature [nasal] is a dependent of the Spontaneous Voicing node (SV-node), THEN there are prenalized stops.
Keywords
Domain
phonology
Type
implication
Status
achronic
Quality
statistical
Basis
Southern and Northern Barasano, Cubeo, and Desano (Tucanoan), Guaraní (Tupi)
Source
Piggott 1992: 74
Counterexamples

One Comment

  1. FP
    FP

    1. Languages such as Southern Barasano “do not have the consonantal contrast between nasal and non-nasal segments but between voiced and voiceless ones” (Piggott 1992: 47). Piggott (1992: 49) proposes that all voiced segments in the consonant system of such languages, including the prenasalized stops, are sonorants -> the voiced-voiceless distinction in this type of systems is a contrast between sonorants and non-sonorants.2. Spontaneous Voicing (SV-node), “ is an alternate label for the feature [sonorant]”. It is “a vocal tract configuration in which the vocal cords vibrate in response to the passage of air” (Piggott 1992: 48).

    1. May 2020

Comments are closed.