Skip to content

Universal 337:

Posted in Universals Archive

Universal 337:

Original
If the verb agrees with subject and object and there are confix-forms such as s-V-s-o, then there are s-V-o forms as well.
Standardized
Whenever the verb agrees with subject and object, IF there are confix forms such as s-V-s-o, THEN there is also non-confixal subject agreement in the order s-V-o.
Keywords
verb agreement, subject, direct object, person, affix-order, prefix, suffix, confix
Domain
inflection, syntax
Type
implication
Status
achronic
Quality
statistical
Basis
languages surveyed in Kozinsky 1981
Source
Kozinsky 1981
Counterexamples
Amharic (Semitic, Afro-Asiatic) (Kozinsky 1981)

One Comment

  1. FP
    FP

    One counterexample! And how many examples for which the implication is true?

    1. May 2020

Comments are closed.