Skip to content

Universal 576: semantic agreement for personal pronouns ⇒ semantic agreement for relative pronouns ⇒
⇒ semantic agreement for predicates ⇒ semantic agreement for attributes

Posted in Universals Archive

Universal 576: semantic agreement for personal pronouns ⇒ semantic agreement for relative pronouns ⇒
⇒ semantic agreement for predicates ⇒ semantic agreement for attributes

Original
The Agreement Hierarchy
If agreement features are optionally referential-semantic or syntactic, the likelihood of semantic agreement increases monotonically as one moves down the following hierarchy of targets:
Attributive > Predicate > Relative pronoun > Personal pronoun
Standardized
IF personal pronouns can have semantic rather than syntactic agreement in gender or number with a particular noun, THEN relative pronouns, predicative, and attributive constituents can also have semantic agreement with that noun.
IF relative pronouns can have semantic agreement in gender or number with a particular noun, THEN predicative, and attributive constituents can also have semantic agreement with that noun.
IF predicative constituents can have semantic agreement in gender or number with a particular noun, THEN attributive constituents can also have semantic agreement with that noun.
Keywords
agreement, gender, number, attributive, predicate, relative pronoun, personal pronoun
Domain
inflection, syntax, semantics
Type
implicational hierarchy
Status
achronic
Quality
absolute
Basis
languages in Corbett 1979, Corbett 1988, Corbett 1991: more than 200 from all over the place; claim originally motivated by Slavonic
Source
Corbett 1979, Corbett 1983, Corbett 1988, Corbett 1991: Ch. 8
Counterexamples
Hungarian (Ugric, Uralic) possibly violates this hierarchy, if appositives count as attributes. In Hungarian, appositives (nouns and adjectives) show semantic agreement, whereas predicates do not (Moravcsik 1997).

One Comment

  1. FP
    FP

    See #2008 for the 1991 version.

    1. May 2020

Comments are closed.