Skip to content

Universal 581: (¬gender (Sg) & gender (1 non-Sg)) ⇒ gender (2 non-Sg) ⇒ gender (3 non-Sg)

Posted in Universals Archive

Universal 581: (¬gender (Sg) & gender (1 non-Sg)) ⇒ gender (2 non-Sg) ⇒ gender (3 non-Sg)

Original
In languages without Gender distinctions in the Singular, for any one non-Singular number, the existence of a Gender distinction in 1st person implies the same Gender distinction in 2nd person, which in turn implies the same Gender distinction in 3d person.
Standardized
When there are no gender distinctions in the singular, IF there is a gender distinction in 1st person, THEN there is the same gender distinction in 2nd person for any one non-singular number, and IF there is a gender distinction in 2nd person, THEN there is the same gender distinction in 3rd person.
Keywords
gender, number, singular, non-singular, person, 1, 2, 3
Domain
inflection
Type
implication
Status
achronic
Quality
absolute
Basis
sample of Greenberg 1963; languages in Plank & Schellinger 1994a, Plank & Schellinger 1994b, Plank & Schellinger 1997
Source
suggested by Moravcsik in Plank & Schellinger 1994a: 100
Counterexamples

One Comment

  1. FP
    FP

    This is a corrected version of Greenberg’s Universal 45 (see #520). See further Plank & Schellinger 1997.

    1. May 2020

Comments are closed.