Skip to content

Universal 69: Prep ⇒ (N A ⇒ N G)

Posted in Universals Archive

Universal 69: Prep ⇒ (N A ⇒ N G)

Original
If a language has Prep word order, then if the adjective follows the noun, the genitive follows the noun.
Standardized
IF there are prepositions, THEN IF the adjective follows the noun, THEN the genitive follows the noun.
Keywords
order, preposition, adjective, noun, attributive, genitive
Domain
syntax
Type
nested implication
Status
achronic
Quality
statistical
Basis
sample of 350 languages in Hawkins 1983
Source
Hawkins 1979: 627; Hawkins 1980: 202; Hawkins 1983: 66
Counterexamples
1. Hawkins 1983: 67 himself mentions four languages as Prep & N A & GN: Kaliai-Kove, Gitua (both E. Malayo-Polynesian, Austronesian); Arapesh (Toricelli); Karen (Tibeto-Burman, Sino-Tibetan). They are all SVO, and therefore Hawkins adds an additional constraint to the implication: see #70. 2. Prep & NA & GN: Kilivila (Oceanic, Austronesian); Garawa (Garawan, Australian) (Dryer 1991, 2000). Bwe Karen, Sgaw Karen (Karen, Tibeto-Burman); Hmong Njua (Miao-Yao), Buru, Nuaulu, Alune, Paulohi, Tetun (Central Malayo-Polynesian, Austronesian); Kaliai-Kove, Patep, Kilivila (Oceanic, Austronesian); Irarutu, Taba, Mor (South Halmahera-NW New Guinea); Sahu, West Makian (Noth Halmaheran); Abun (Birds Head, West Papuan); Arapesh (Toricelli); Palikur (Maipuran, Arawak); Mataco (Mataco) (Dryer 2000).

One Comment

  1. FP
    FP

    1. Dryer 1988: 198: “There is no clear evidence for the correlation between Adposition-Noun and Adjective-Noun order.”Dryer 1988: 200: “There is no clear evidence for the correlation between Genitive-Noun and Adjective-Noun order.” 2. Since the 1990s, Hawkins proposes alternative explanations of his universals (see e.g. Hawkins 1993: 234).

    1. May 2020

Comments are closed.