Skip to content

Universal 88: N Dem ⇒ N Rel;
equivalently: Rel N ⇒ Dem N

Posted in Universals Archive

Universal 88: N Dem ⇒ N Rel;
equivalently: Rel N ⇒ Dem N

Original
If a language has noun before demonstrative, then it has noun before relative clause.
Standardized
IF the demonstrative follows the noun, THEN the relative clause follows the noun.

OR, BY CONTRAPOSITION:
IF the relative clause precedes the noun, THEN the demonstrative precedes the noun.

Keywords
order, relative clause, demonstrative, noun
Domain
syntax
Type
implication
Status
achronic
Quality
statistical, almost absolute
Basis
sample of 350 languages in Hawkins 1983
Source
Hawkins 1983: 83-84
Counterexamples
Rel N & N Dem: Basque (isolate) (Hawkins 1983: 84, Dryer 2000).Chaha (Semitic, Afro-Asiatic); [Modern Literary] Tibetan (Tibetic, Tibeto-Burman), Meithei, Ao, Tangkhul Naga, Bawm (Kuki-Chin-Naga, Tibeto-Burman), Achang, Akha, Hani, Lahu (Burmese-Lolo, Tibeto-Burman), Bai (Bai, Tibeto-Burman); Kobon (East New Guinea Highlands); Kombai (Central and South New Guinea); Yale (Mek, Trans-New Guinea) (Dryer 2000).

One Comment

  1. FP
    FP

    Since the 1990s, Hawkins has proposed alternative explanations of his universals (see e.g. Hawkins 1993: 234).

    1. May 2020

Comments are closed.