Universal #1087
Legacy number: 1087
| Number | 1083 |
| Original | ... languages that show agreement with full noun phrases but not with pronouns (where the pronoun is independent, i. e. not a case of pronominal inflection) are rare. |
| Standardized | IF there is agreement with full noun phrases, THEN very likely there is agreement with pronouns. |
| Formula | agreement with full noun phrases ⇒ agreement with pronouns |
| Keywords | agreement, noun, pronoun |
| Domain | inflection, syntax |
| Type | implication |
| Status | achronic |
| Quality | statistical |
| Basis | Bantu languages, North-East Caucasian languages, Uto-Aztecan languages, some English and French-based pidgins, non standard versions of French and English, English dialects |
| Source | Börjas & Chapman 1998: 92 |
Discussion
Notes
Georgopoulos 1991: 48-54 proposed that Palauan (W. Malayo-Polynesian, Austronesian) is a language where there is agreement with full noun phrases but not with pronouns, but Bresnan 1995: 264 argues that the elements in question are in fact bound pronouns; see Börjas & Chapman 1998: 96, fn. 29.
Comment
Georgopoulos 1991: 48-54 proposed that Palauan (W. Malayo-Polynesian, Austronesian) is a language where there is agreement with full noun phrases but not with pronouns, but Bresnan 1995: 264 argues that the elements in question are in fact bound pronouns; see Börjas & Chapman 1998: 96, fn. 29.
Log in to join the discussion.