Universal #11
Legacy number: 11
| Number | 11 |
| Original | Consistent OV languages tend to be agglutinative in their morphology. |
| Standardized | IF basic order is consistently OV, THEN the morphology tends to be agglutinative. |
| Formula | OV ⇒ agglutinative |
| Keywords | order, OV, agglutination |
| Domain | morphology, syntax |
| Type | implication |
| Status | achronic |
| Quality | statistical |
| Basis | languages in Lehmann 1973 |
| Source | W.P.Lehmann 1973: 47 |
Discussion
Counterexamples
Akkadian (E. Semitic, Afro-Asiatic): basic constituent order OV, but language is highly (intro-)flexive/fusional (e.g. izzakar < *iztakar ‘he called’ consisting of three morphemes, i- [3sg.m.], z_k_r ‘call‘, _ta_a [Perfekt]). Akkadian word order differs from that of other Semitic languages and is generally thought to be influenced by Sumerian. (F. Kammerzell, p.c.)
Notes
See also #13.Should probably be the other way round:IF agglutination, THEN verb-final.
Log in to join the discussion.
Should probably be the other way round: IF agglutination, THEN verb-final.