Universal #1100
Legacy number: 1100
| Number | 1096 |
| Original | There is an overall distinction between Type A and B languages, with the following correlations (i.e. mutual implications) of opposite properties defining the two types: See Graphics |
| Standardized | (holistic) Type A vs. Type B |
| Keywords | nasal vowel, syllable, order, attributive, adjective, noun, prefix, suffix, preposition, postposition, serial verb, number, compounding, consonant, agreement, subject |
| Domain | phonology, morphology, syntax |
| Type | mutual implication |
| Status | achronic |
| Quality | statistical |
| Basis | a range of languages of Sub-Saharan Africa (Type A: West Atlantic, Bantu, Hausa, Niger-Congo; Type B: Mande, Kwa, possibly Voltaic (although there are several Type A features)) |
| Source | Houis 1970: 59-67 |
Discussion
Counterexamples
Yoruba (Defoid, Benue-Congo): Type B in terms of (a), (b), Type A in terms of (c), (d).Commercial Sango (Adamawa-Ubangi, Niger-Congo): Type A features: (i), (c), (d), (j); Type B features: (a), (b).Sara (Central Sudanic, Chari-Nile, Nilo-Saharan): some dialects more like Type A , others more like Type B.
Notes
Apparently, correlations are only intended to be valid for Sub-Saharan African languages, rather than universally.
Comment
Apparently, correlations are only intended to be valid for Sub-Saharan African languages, rather than universally.
Log in to join the discussion.