Universal #1352

Legacy number: 1352

 Number  1348
 Original  A subtrahend is always a simple lexical expression.
 Standardized  In numeral systems, a subtrahend is always a simple lexical expression.
 Keywords  numeral
 Domain  word formation
 Type  implication
 Status  achronic
 Quality  absolute
 Basis  56 languages mentioned in Greenberg 1978a
 Source  Greenberg 1978a: 260 (#13)

← Back to Universals Archive

Discussion
Notes
1. The subtrahend is the number subtracted, the minuend the number from which subtraction takes place, and the remainder is the result.2. By the term ‘lexical expression’ Greenberg means: Every numeral expresses a number as a function with one or more numbers as arguments. ‘Twenty-three’ in English expresses 23 as a function (a x b) + c in which the argument ‘a’ has the value 10, ‘b’ the value 2, and ‘c’ the value 3. A limiting case is the identity function which has the same value as its argument, e.g. ‘three’ = 3. If this is the case, we may say that a particular number receives simple lexical representation, none other than the identity function (cf. #530).3. According to this implication, numerals like ‘two from twenty’ (where the subtrahend, ‘two’, is simple) are possible, numerals like ‘four-teen from twenty’ (where the subtrahend is complex) are ruled out.4. Whereas the subtrahend may not be complex, the minuend may be. For example in Yoruba (Defoid, Benue-Congo) 65 is [(20x4)-10]-5, in which there are two complex minuends, (20x4) and (20x4)-10.
Comment
Frans Plank · 3 Aug 2006
1. The SUUBSTRAHEND is the number subtracted, the MINUEND the number from which subtraction takes place, and the REMAINDER is the result.

2. By the term 'lexical expression' Greenberg means: Every numeral expresses a number as a function with one or more numbers as arguments. 'Twenty-three' in English expresses 23 as a function (a x b) + c in which the argument 'a' has the value 10, 'b' the value 2, and 'c' the value 3. A limiting case is the identity function which has the same value as its argument, e.g. 'three' = 3. If this is the case, we may say that a particular number receives simple lexical representation, none other than the identity function (cf. <a class="innerLink" href="browse.php?entry_id=530"><img src="../img/entry.gif" border="0">).

3. According to this implication, numerals like 'two from twenty' (where the subtrahend, 'two', is simple) are possible, numerals like 'four-teen from twenty' (where the subtrahend is complex) are ruled out.

4. Whereas the subtrahend may not be complex, the minuend may be. For example in Yoruba (Defoid, Benue-Congo) 65 is [(20x4)-10]-5, in which there are two complex minuends, (20x4) and (20x4)-10.