Universal #1571

Legacy number: 1571

 Number  1567
 Original  If there are reflexive constructions of type (a) ‘Er küßt sich mit ihr’ in a language, there are likely to be reflexive constructions of type (b) ‘Sie küssen sich’; the reverse is not true.
 Standardized  IF there are reflexive constructions of type (a) X VERBs REFL WITH Y, THEN there are likely to be reflexive constructions of type (b) X & Y VERB REFL.
 Keywords  reflexive
 Domain  syntax
 Type  implication
 Status  achronic
 Quality  statistical
 Basis  languages surveyed in Nedjalkov 1980
 Source  Nedjalkov 1980: 226

← Back to Universals Archive

Discussion
Notes
1. Examples from German:(a) Er küßt sich mit ihr he kisses REFL with her(b) Sie küssen sich they kiss REFLAccording to Wellander, in Old High German there was type (b) and no type (a).2. The relevant verb class are, essentially, symmetric predicates. There is great variation among relevant verbs (and speakers) as to whether they permit construction (a). But it seems to be valid that EACH VERB which permits construction (a) also permits (b).3. There are also a few other prepositions possible in (a), e.g.: Er trennt sich von ihr he separates REFL from her Sie trennen sich they separate REFL4. There are subtle semantic differences between constructions (a) and (b).5. The availability of a type (a) construction, called "discontinuous reflexives", has been claimed – by Tanya Reinhardt, Tal Siloni, Alexis Dimitriadis, et al. (Utrecht), elaborating a distinction between LEXICAL and GRAMMATICAL reflexives – to be of considerable typological significance, correlating with further differences in the grammar and lexical representation of argument structure.
Comment
Frans Plank · 3 Aug 2006
1. Examples from German:
<table class = 'textTable'>
<tr>
<td valign = "top">(a)</td>
<td> Er küβt sich mit ihr</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> </td>
<td> he kisses REFL with her</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign = "top">(b)</td>
<td> Sie küssen sich</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> </td>
<td> they kiss REFL<?td>
</tr>
</table>
According to Wellander, in Old High German there was type (b) and no type (a).

2. The relevant verb class are, essentially, symmetric predicates. There is great variation among relevant verbs (and speakers) as to whether they permit construction (a). But it seems to be valid that EACH VERB which permits construction (a) also permits (b).

3. There are also a few other prepositions possible in (a), e.g.: Er trennt sich von ihr he separates REFL from her Sie trennen sich they separate REFL

4. There are subtle semantic differences between constructions (a) and (b).

5. The availability of a type (a) construction, called "discontinuous reflexives", has been claimed – by Tanya Reinhardt, Tal Siloni, Alexis Dimitriadis, et al. (Utrecht), elaborating a distinction between LEXICAL and GRAMMATICAL reflexives – to be of considerable typological significance, correlating with further differences in the grammar and lexical representation of argument structure.