Universal #1583
Legacy number: 1583
| Number | 1579 |
| Original | If there are causative affixes in a language which serve to form causative verbs from transitives, then this language also has causative affixes which serve to form causative verbs from intransitives. |
| Standardized | IF there are causative affixes which serve to form causative verbs from transitives, THEN there will be causative affixes which serve to form causative verbs from intransitives. |
| Keywords | causative, transitivity |
| Domain | morphology, syntax |
| Type | implication |
| Status | achronic |
| Quality | absolute |
| Basis | languages mentioned in Nedjalkov & Sil’nickij 1969, Nedjalkov & Sil’nickij 1973 |
| Source | Nedjalkov & Sil’nickij 1969: 26, Nedjalkov & Sil’nickij 1973: 8 |
Discussion
Notes
The reverse assertion does not hold. There are languages in which, with certain exceptions, causative affixes only apply to intransitive verbs: Arabic (Semitic, Afro-Asiatic), Blackfoot (Algonquian), Gothic (Germanic), Indonesian (Malay-Polynesian), Estonian (Finnic, Uralic), Klamath (Klamath-Modoc (=Lutuanian)), Coos (Coosan), Takelma (isolate), and others. It seems that there is no language in which causative affixes are attached only to transitives (Nedjalkov & Sil’nickij 1969: 25-26, 1973: 7).
Comment
The reverse assertion does not hold. There are languages in which, with certain exceptions, causative affixes only apply to intransitive verbs: Arabic (Semitic, Afro-Asiatic), Blackfoot (Algonquian), Gothic (Germanic), Indonesian (Malay-Polynesian), Estonian (Finnic, Uralic), Klamath (Klamath-Modoc (=Lutuanian)), Coos (Coosan), Takelma (isolate), and others. It seems that there is no language in which causative affixes are attached only to transitives (Nedjalkov & Sil'nickij 1969: 25-26, Nedjalkov & Sil'nickij 1973: 7).
Log in to join the discussion.