Universal #1597
Legacy number: 1597
| Number | 1593 |
| Original | Internally headed relative clauses occur only in languages manifesting null anaphora (that is, the use of null NPs in place of lexical pronouns etc. in most argument positions). |
| Standardized | IF there are internally headed relative clauses, THEN there will be null anaphora (i.e., pro drop). |
| Formula | internal relative clause ⇒ null anaphora |
| Keywords | relative clause, internal (= replacive), anaphora, pro drop |
| Domain | syntax |
| Type | implication |
| Status | achronic |
| Quality | absolute |
| Basis | ? |
| Source | Cole 1987: 282 |
Discussion
Notes
In INTERNALLY HEADED relative clauses, the nominal which is understood as the head occurs, on the surface, in a position internal to the modifying clause. Downing (#679) calls such relative clauses ‘replacive’, Keenan (#1595) calls them ‘internal RelCs’, Gorbet (#1601) refers to them as to ‘headless relative clauses’ Gil (2000) and Cole himself refer to them as to ‘internally-headed’.
Log in to join the discussion.
Downing (<a class="innerLink" href="browse.php?entry_id=679"><img src="../img/entry.gif" border="0">) calls such relative clauses 'replacive', Keenan (<a class="innerLink" href="browse.php?entry_id=1595"><img src="../img/entry.gif" border="0">) calls them 'internal RelCs', Gorbet (<a class="innerLink" href="browse.php?entry_id=1601"><img src="../img/entry.gif" border="0">) refers to them as to 'headless relative clauses' Gil 2000 and Cole himself refer to them as to 'internally-headed'.