Universal #1614
Legacy number: 1614
| Number | 1610 |
| Original | In languages with verb agreement, patient verb agreement appears more frequently in verb-peripheral languages [i.e. verb-initial and verb-final languages] than in verb-medial languages. |
| Standardized | Whenever there is verb agreement, agreement with the patient NP is likelier if basic order is verb-peripheral (i.e., verb-initial or verb-final) than if it is verb-medial. |
| Keywords | order, verb-initial, verb-final, verb-medial, agreement, verb, patient |
| Domain | inflection, syntax |
| Type | implication |
| Status | achronic |
| Quality | statistical |
| Basis | 11 SOV languages: Kiowa (Kiowa-Tanoan), Burmese (Burmese-Lolo), Quechua (Andean), Hindi (Indic, IE), Diyari (Karnic, Pama-Nyungan), Pengo (Dravidian), Kanuri (Saharan), Basque (isolate), Turkish (Turkic), Japanese (Japanese-Ryukyuan), and Mende (Mande, Niger-Congo). 6 V-initial languages: Welsh (Celtic, IE), Maori (Oceanic, Eastern Malayo-Polynesian), Malagasy (Barito, Western Malayo-Polynesian), Papago (Uto-Aztecan), Maya (Mayan), and Classical Arabic (Semitic, Afro-Asiatic). |
| Source | Foster & Hofling 1987: 479 |
Discussion
Counterexamples
Kanuri and Turkish have verb agreement and verb-final order but do not show patient agreement (Foster & Hofling 1987: 478, Table 2).Welsh (Celtic, IE) is verb-initial, has verb agreement but no patient agreement (Foster & Hofling 1987: 490, Table 4).
Notes
1. “The higher frequency of patient agreement in verb-lateral languages may be related to the tendency noted by Schwartz (1972: 219-220, here #1271) for a true ergative (that is, nominative-ergative as opposed to accusative-ergative) ‘view of transitivity’ to appear only in verb-lateral languages. Ergativity is quite frequent in the SOV languages of our sample. It is apparent in Pengo, Diyari, Hindi, Kiowa, Basque, Mende and possibly Quechua.” (Foster & Hofling 1987: 479-480).2. “The prevalence of patient verb agreement in both verb-initial and verb-final languages suggests that the difficulties in processing strings of NPs noted for SOV languages is present, though to a lesser degree, in verb-initial languages, and that more extensive verb agreement facilitates hearer comprehension in both cases.” (ibid.).
Log in to join the discussion.
2. "The prevalence of patient verb agreement in both verb-initial and verb-final languages suggests that the difficulties in processing strings of NPs noted for SOV languages is present, though to a lesser degree, in verb-initial languages, and that more extensive verb agreement facilitates hearer comprehension in both cases." (ibid.).