Universal #1620
Legacy number: 1620
| Number | 1616 |
| Original | The Null Subject Parameter: Null subjects are permitted in all and only languages with morphologically uniform inflectional paradigms. |
| Standardized | IF null subjects is permissible (aka subject pro-drop), THEN the inflectional paradigms of verbs are morphologically uniform, and vice versa. |
| Formula | subject pro-drop ⇔ inflectional paradigms of verbs are morphologically uniform |
| Keywords | subject pro-drop, verb, paradigm |
| Domain | inflection, syntax |
| Type | mutual implication |
| Status | achronic |
| Quality | absolute |
| Basis | Japanese (Japanese-Ryukyuan), Chinese (Sino-Tibetan), Irish (Celtic, Indo-European), Romance, Germanic, and Semitic languages |
| Source | Jaeggli & Safir 1989: 29-31 |
Discussion
Notes
An inflectional paradigm P in a language L is MORPHOLOGICALLLY UNIFORM if P has either only underived inflectional forms or only derived inflectional forms.E.g.,Latin verb infl is uniform: all person-numbers have some suffix.Chinese is also uniform: no infl exponents for any person-number.English verb infl is NOT uniform: 3rd Sg has -s, rest has nothing.Plank (2003, EUROTYP NP volume) considers this claim too liberal: non-inflected verbs may license the dropping of pronouns of 3rd person, but not normally of 1st and 2nd.
Log in to join the discussion.
E.g.,
Latin verb infl is uniform: all person-numbers have some suffix.
Chinese is also uniform: no infl exponents for any person-number.
English verb infl is NOT uniform: 3rd Sg has -s, rest has nothing.
Plank 2003 (EUROTYP NP volume) considers this claim too liberal: non-inflected verbs may license the dropping of pronouns of 3rd person, but not normally of 1st and 2nd.