Universal #1633

Legacy number: 1633

 Number  1628
 Original  If the language has the basic order “topic-before-focus”, then the secondary topic would precede the focus.
Correspondingly, in languages where subject precedes object, causee, recipient, and benefactive precede the patient in double object constructions.
 Standardized  IF basic order is Topic-before-Focus, THEN the secondary topic precedes the focus.

Correspondingly:
IF subject precedes object in a basic word order, THEN causee, recipient, and benefactive [being secondary topics] precede the patient in double object constructions.
 Keywords  order, SOV, SVO, VSO, topic, focus, secondary topic, double object, causee, recipient, benefactive, patient
 Domain  syntax
 Type  implication
 Status  achronic
 Quality  absolute
 Basis  Object before Subject languages: VOS: Tzotzil (Mayan), Malagasy (Malayo-Polynesian), OVS: Hixkaryana (Carib), Pari (Nilotic, Nilo-Saharan), OSV: Hurrian (isolate), Kabardian (North Caucasian); Subject before Object languages: SOV: Tamil (Dravidian), Korean (Altaic), SVO: Kinyarwanda (Bantu, Niger-Congo), Dutch [in the main clause](Germanic, IE), VSO: Biblical Hebrew (Semitic, Afro-Asiatic)
 Source  Polinsky 1995: 190

← Back to Universals Archive

Discussion
Notes
Why "correspondingly"?
Comment
Frans Plank · 3 Aug 2006
Why "correspondingly"?