Universal #1637
Legacy number: 1637
| Number | 1632 |
| Original | In polysynthetic languages, interrogative phrases are constrained to appear in clause-initial position. |
| Standardized | IF there is polysynthesis, THEN interrogative phrases are constrained to appear in clause-initial position (through WH-movement). |
| Formula | polysynthesis ⇒ Wh-movement |
| Keywords | polysynthesis, interrogative, wh-movement |
| Domain | morphology, syntax |
| Type | implication |
| Status | achronic |
| Quality | statistical |
| Basis | Polysynthetic languages like Mohawk (Iroquoian), Nahuatl (Uto-Aztecan), Kiowa (Kiowa- Tanoan), Gunwinjguan (Gunwingguan, Australian), Wichita (Caddoan), Chukchi (Chukchi-Kamchatkan), Ainu (isolate). Non-polysynthetic languages like Greenlandic (Eskimo-Aleut), Lakhota (Siouan), Slave (Athabaskan), Alamblak (Sepik-Ramu), Chichewa (Bantoid, Niger-Congo), Choctaw (Muskogean) |
| Source | Baker 1996: 72 |
Discussion
Notes
Baker defines polysynthetic languages as typically being head-marked and having free word order. His finding that polysynthetic languages are prone to have WH-movement is contrasted by the generalization by Bach (#1638) that interrogative phrases are usually in situ in pure head-final languages.
Comment
Baker defines polysynthetic languages as typically being head-marked and having free word order. His finding that polysynthetic languages are prone to have WH-movement is contrasted by the generalization by Bach (<a class="innerLink" href="browse.php?entry_id=1638"><img src="../img/entry.gif" border="0">) that interrogative phrases are usually in situ in pure head-final languages.
Log in to join the discussion.