Universal #1650
Legacy number: 1650
| Number | 1645 |
| Original | If a language has major, salient, head-marking morphology anywhere, it will have it at the clause level. If a language has dependent-marking morphology at the clause level, it will have it at the phrase level. <img src="../img/graphics/1650.gif"" alt=""> |
| Standardized | IF there is major, salient dependent-marking morphology at the clause level, THEN there is dependent marking morphology at the phrase level. |
| Formula | head-marking anywhere ⇒ head-marking at the clause level; dependent-marking at the clause level ⇒ > dependent-marking at the phrase level |
| Keywords | head-marking, dependent-marking |
| Domain | inflection, syntax |
| Type | implication |
| Status | achronic |
| Quality | absolute |
| Basis | 60 languages sample |
| Source | Nichols 1986: 75 |
Discussion
Counterexamples
Nanai (Southern Tungus), in which phrases are head-marked, but clauses are mostly dependent-marked. Two potential counterexamples are Ket (isolate) and Ewenki (Northern Tungus). Ket uses subject and object cases, but is otherwise almost entirely head-marking: its sole phrasal dependent-marked pattern is partial agreement of adjectives with head nouns. Ewenki is much like Nanai, except that its adjectives agree. Ket and Ewenki thus support the second statement; but this is poor support, in that agreement of adjectives with head nouns is cross-linguistically not well correlated with over-all language type (Nichols 1986: 76).
Notes
Nichols (1986: 106) uses the term GOVERNED to refer to dependents whose presence is required, and whose morphological form is determined, by their heads; and the term SUBCATEGORIZED for those whose presence is required, but whose form is not determined by the head.
Comment
Nichols 1986: 106: uses the term GOVERNED to refer to dependents whose presence is required, and whose morphological form is determined, by their heads; and the term SUBCATEGORIZED for those whose presence is required, but whose form is not determined by the head.
Log in to join the discussion.