Universal #1876

Legacy number: 1876

 Number  1871
 Original  It holds as a strong statistical implication that whenever there is a 1st person exclusive dual there is also a 1st person inclusive dual.
 Standardized  IF there is a 1st person exclusive dual, THEN there is also a 1st person inclusive dual.
 Keywords  inclusive, exclusive, person, 1, number, dual
 Domain  morphology
 Type  implication
 Status  achronic
 Quality  statistical
 Basis  languages surveyed in Greenberg 1988
 Source  Greenberg 1988: 1-2

← Back to Universals Archive

Discussion
Counterexamples
1. Savo (East Papuan) (Greenberg 1988: 2).2. Tübatulabal (Uto-Aztecan) has Dual with 1st person exclusive, but not with 1st person inclusive, at least according to the grammatical description of Voegelin (1935); the accompanying collection of texts, however, tells a different story <p.c., M. Cysouw>; 4. Ngankikurrungkurr (Daly, Australian) (Hoddinott 1988: 94) <p.c., M. Cysouw>
Notes
1. "1st person inclusive is a favoured category among duals." (Greenberg 1988: 1)2. Moravcsik claims the same thing also for Plural, cf. #578.3. Cf. #1410.
Comment
Frans Plank · 3 Aug 2006
1. "1st person inclusive is a favoured category among duals." (Greenberg 1988: 1)

2. Moravcsik claims the same thing also for Plural, cf. <a class="innerLink" href="browse.php?entry_id=578"><img src="../img/entry.gif" border="0">.

3. Cf. <a class="innerLink" href="browse.php?entry_id=1410"><img src="../img/entry.gif" border="0">