Universal #1885

Legacy number: 1885

 Number  1880
 Original  If a language has different tense categories and shows a split between 1st versus 2nd/3rd person marking in one of these categories, it is most probably that this split will occur in the future tense.
 Standardized  When there are different tense categories and there is a split between 1st versus 2nd/3rd person in one of these categories, IF such a split occurs in tenses other than future, THEN it will also occur in the future.
 Formula  1st vs. 2nd/3rd person split: future > present > past
 Keywords  person, 1, 2, 3, split, tense, future, present, past
 Domain  inflection, syntax
 Type  implication
 Status  achronic
 Quality  statistical
 Basis  languages mentioned in Helmbrecht 1999
 Source  Helmbrecht 1999: 291

← Back to Universals Archive

Discussion
Notes
See #1886, which says the same thing.
Comment
Frans Plank · 3 Aug 2006
See <a class="innerLink" href="browse.php?entry_id=1886"><img src="../img/entry.gif" border="0">, which says the same thing.