Universal #190
Legacy number: 190
| Number | 190 |
| Original | If only some locational relations are expressed in a case system, they will always include simple location. Next most likely will be allative, then ablative, then prolative. |
| Standardized | IF there is a prolative case, THEN there will be an ablative case. IF there is an ablative case, THEN there will be an allative case. IF there is an allative case, THEN there will be a locative case. |
| Formula | locative > allative > ablative > prolative |
| Keywords | case system, local case, locative, allative, ablative, prolative |
| Domain | inflection |
| Type | implication |
| Status | achronic but presumably diachronically motivated |
| Quality | absolute |
| Basis | languages mentioned in Kilby 1983, Stolz 1992 |
| Source | Kilby 1983: 55; Stolz 1992: 83-85 (same hierarchy without prolative) |
Discussion
Notes
1. Kilby 1983: 55: “Note that this does not imply that a system in which only two cases express locational concepts will necessarily have a locative and an allative case: two relations may be expressed in a single form. In Manchu (Tungus, Altaic), for instance, one case expresses locative and allative, and another expresses ablative.”2. For Stolz this hierarchy contradicts the Finno-Ugric theory of Ablative > Locative > Allative, see also # 191, 1225, 1227, 1128.
Log in to join the discussion.
2. For Stolz this hierarchy contradicts the Finno-Ugric theory of Ablative > Locative > Allative, see also <a class="innerLink" href="browse.php?entry_id=191"><img src="../img/entry.gif" border="0">, <a class="innerLink" href="browse.php?entry_id=1225"><img src="../img/entry.gif" border="0">, <a class="innerLink" href="browse.php?nentry_id=1227"><img src="../img/entry.gif" border="0">, <a class="innerLink" href="browse.php?entry_id=1128"><img src="../img/entry.gif" border="0">.