Universal #2010
Legacy number: 2010
| Number | 2004 |
| Original | [When the controller consists of conjoined NPs and they have features which require resolution,] in person resolution the first person takes precedence over the second, and the second over the third. |
| Standardized | In agreement with conjoined NPs and person resolution is required, when the conjuncts include a 1st person, 1st person agreement forms will be used; otherwise, when the conjuncts include a 2nd person, 2nd person agreement forms will be used; otherwise, 3rd person agreement forms (the default) are used. |
| Keywords | agreement, coordination, resolution rules, person, person hierarchy, 1, 2, 3 |
| Domain | inflection, syntax |
| Type | unconditional |
| Status | achronic |
| Quality | absolute? |
| Basis | "over 200 languages" from all over the place |
| Source | Corbett 1991: 262, and many others |
Discussion
Notes
1. "It has been claimed that rules equivalent to those given above are universal. This suggestion appears well founded, not only because such rules are reported frequently, but also because they match the hierarchy of reference which constrains pronominal systems independently of the resolution rules" (Corbett 1991: 262f).Here is the problem: there are lgs where addressee is ranked above speaker in the reference hierarchy, and where the categories "1st/2nd person" have a different meaning. See further Plank 1984, and others.
Log in to join the discussion.
Here is the problem: there are lgs where addressee is ranked above speaker in the reference hierarchy, and where the categories "1st/2nd person" have a different meaning. See further Plank 1984, and others.