Universal #2020
Legacy number: 2020
| Number | 2014 |
| Original | Long-distance reciprocals are not clearly attested in natural languages, to my knowledge. |
| Standardized | There are no (clear cases of) long-distance reciprocals. |
| Keywords | reciprocal, binding |
| Domain | syntax |
| Type | unconditional |
| Status | achronic |
| Quality | absolute? |
| Basis | personal knowledge |
| Source | Higginbotham 1985: 551, with acknowledgments to Ken Hale |
Discussion
Notes
"It's intriguing, non-trivial, has no obvious explanation (though several possible ones spring to mind), and I hope some well-read or linguistically adventurous soul will come up with a counter-example." <Nick Evans, p.c.>
Comment
"It's intriguing, non-trivial, has no obvious explanation (though several possible ones spring to mind), and I hope some well-read or linguistically adventurous soul will come up with a counter-example." <Nick Evans, p.c.>
Log in to join the discussion.