Universal #2034
Legacy number: 2034
| Number | 2028 |
| Original | Generally agreed upon "facts" about contour tones (marked = more complex, rarer): (a) contour tones are more marked than level tones; (b) rising tones are more marked than falling tones; (c) rising-falling and falling-rising tones are more marked than rising and falling tones. Markedness generalizations: The more marked a tone is, (i) the more likely it is absent in a tone system; (ii) the more likely it is to be restricted to a hospitable tone bearing unit (e.g. long, prominent, sonorous). |
| Standardized | Generally agreed upon "facts" about contour tones (marked = more complex, rarer): (a) contour tones are more marked than level tones; (b) rising tones are more marked than falling tones; (c) rising-falling and falling-rising tones are more marked than rising and falling tones. Markedness generalizations:The more marked a tone is, (i) the more likely it is absent in a tone system;(ii) the more likely it is to be restricted to a hospitable tone bearing unit (e.g. long, prominent, sonorous). |
| Keywords | tone, contour tone, level tone, markedness |
| Domain | phonology |
| Type | implication |
| Status | achronic |
| Quality | absolute? |
| Basis | "general agreement of experts" |
| Source | Hyman 2003 |
Discussion
Notes
See #2033.
Comment
See <a class="innerLink" href="browse.php?entry_id=2033"><img src="../img/entry.gif" border="0">
Log in to join the discussion.