Universal #278
Legacy number: 278
| Number | 277 |
| Original | If a language has VOS order, then it has no verbal inflection. |
| Standardized | IF basic order is VOS, THEN there is no verbal inflection. |
| Formula | VOS ⇒ ¬ verbal inflection |
| Keywords | order, VOS, inflection, verb |
| Domain | inflection, syntax |
| Type | implication |
| Status | achronic |
| Quality | absolute |
| Basis | 50 languages of Bybee 1985b sample, see Bybee 1985b: 215-216 |
| Source | Bybee 1985b: 46-47 |
Discussion
Counterexamples
Fijian, Gilbertese (both Malayo-Polynesian), Tzeltal (Mayan), Otomi (Oto-Manguean), Ineseño Chumach (Hokan), Baure (Arawakan), Tzotzil, Kekchi (both Mayan), Tsou (Formosan, Austronesian) are VOS and have a prefixal subject agreement and some form of suffixal object agreement (Keenan 1978: 288).
Notes
1. Cf. a less restrictive claim by Keenan (#1518): If a language is subject-final then either transitive verbs of unmarked sentences agree with no full noun phrase in the sentence or they agree with two noun phrases. 2. By SUBJECT-FINAL languages Keenan means any language in which full noun phrase subjects must follow noun phrase direct obejcts in the pragmatically least marked sentence types (which contain both subjects and direct objects) of the language.3. According to his survey (#1516): Subject-final languages are always verb-initial. Which means that Keenan’s claims about subject-final languages can be applied to VOS languages as well.
Log in to join the discussion.
2. By SUBJECT-FINAL languages Keenan means any language in which full noun phrase subjects must follow noun phrase direct obejcts in the pragmatically least marked sentence types (which contain both subjects and direct objects) of the language.
3. According to his survey (<a class="innerLink" href="browse.php?entry_id=1516"><img src="../img/entry.gif" border="0">): Subject-final languages are always verb-initial. Which means that Keenan's claims about subject-final languages can be applied to VOS languages as well.