Universal #460
Legacy number: 460
| Number | 459 |
| Original | The subject-marked possessor of a HAVE-construction implies a comitative-marked possessee. |
| Standardized | IF in a HAVE-construction the possessor is marked for subject, THEN the possessee is comitative-marked. |
| Formula | HAVE-construction: possessor is marked for subject ⇒ possessee is comitative marked |
| Keywords | possession, subject, comitative |
| Domain | inflection, syntax |
| Type | implication |
| Status | achronic |
| Quality | absolute |
| Basis | 75 languages surveyed in Ultan 1978e |
| Source | Ultan 1978e: 36 |
Discussion
Notes
In the HAVE-construction the possessor equals the predicate and the possessee equals the subject (for more details see Ultan 1978e: 33-35).I don't see the point. As I read it, the claim is that constructions like (i) are fine, and those like (ii) are out:(i) I have a cow.(ii) I am with a cow.But what's wrong with (i); it's found all over the place?
Log in to join the discussion.
I don't see the point. As I read it, the claim is that constructions like (i) are fine, and those like (ii) are out:
(i) I have a cow.
(ii) I am with a cow.
But what's wrong with (i); it's found all over the place?