Universal #57

Legacy number: 57

 Number  57
 Original  When the descriptive adjective precedes the noun, the demonstrative and the numeral, with overwhelmingly more than chance frequency, do likewise.
 Standardized  IF the descriptive adjective precedes the noun, THEN, with overwhelmingly more than chance frequency, the demonstrative and the numeral do likewise.
 Formula  Adj N ⇒ Dem N & Num N
 Keywords  adjective, noun, demonstrative, numeral, order
 Domain  syntax
 Type  implication
 Status  achronic
 Quality  statistical
 Basis  30 languages of Greenberg 1963 sample
 Source  Greenberg 1963: 86, #18

← Back to Universals Archive

Discussion
Counterexamples
1. A N & N Num: A number of Niger-Congo languages, almost all the Adamawa-Ubangian group, at least one Benue-Congo language, e.g. Efik, Sango, Zande (Greenberg 1989a: 113, 1995: 147; see also Dryer 1988: 208). Gbaya Kaka, Gbeya Bossangoa, Sango, Linda, Zande, Nzakara, Barambu, Ma (all Adamawa-Ubangian, Niger-Congo); Majang (Surmic, Nilo-Saharan); Gude (Biu-Mandara, Chadic, Afro-Asiatic), Hausa, Pa’anci (West Chadic, Afro-Asiatic); Newari, Tamang, Gurung, Thakali, Purki, Balti (Tibetic, Tibeto-Burman), Gallong, Mising, Nishi, Idu (Mirish, Tibeto-Burman); Yagaria, Kewa (East New Guinea Highlands); Yareba (Central and SE New Guinea); Ambulas (Sepik) (Dryer 2000).2. A N & N Dem: Tojolabal and Tzotzil (both Mayan) (Pickett 1983: 543).Berbice Dutch Creole; Mangbetu (C. Sudanic, Nilo-Saharan) [but see Comment 1], the latter is also a language with A N & N Num (Rijkhoff 1992: 257). Gbaya Kaka, Nzakara, Gbeya Bossangoa, Sango, Linda (all Adamawa-Ubangian, Niger-Congo); Majang (Surmic, Nilo-Saharan), Kresh (Bongo-Bagirmi, Nilo-Saharan); Gude (Biu-Mandara, Chadic, Afro-Asiatic), Hausa, Pa’anci (West Chadic, Afro-Asiatic), Chaha (Semitic, Afro-Asiatic); Lahu (Burmic, Sino-Tibetan)[but see Comment 1], Dafla (Tibetic, Sino-Tibetan)[but see Comment 1]; Central Agta (Philippine Austronesian); Nisgha, Coast Tsimshian (Tsimshianic); Jakaltek (Mayan) (Dryer 1989: 272, 2000).
Notes
1. Dryer 2000 no longer classifies Dafla (=Nishi) as AN & NDem, but as AN & DemN/NDem. In fact the typical structure is DemNDem, with two co-occurring demonstrative words. Also, closer examination of Lahu shows it to be AN/NA, not AN. Dryer classifies Mangbetu as NA, not AN.2. Cf. claims of Hawkins’ and Dryer’s: ##73, 75, 114.
Comment
Frans Plank · 3 Aug 2006
1. Dryer 2000 no longer classifies Dafla (=Nishi) as AN & NDem, but as AN & DemN/NDem. In fact the typical structure is DemNDem, with two co-occurring demonstrative words. Also, closer examination of Lahu shows it to be AN/NA, not AN. Dryer classifies Mangbetu as NA, not AN.

2. Cf. claims of Hawkins' and Dryer's: <a class="innerLink" href="browse.php?nentry_id=73"><img src="../img/entry.gif" border="0">, <a class="innerLink" href="browse.php?entry_id=75"><img src="../img/entry.gif" border="0">, <a class="innerLink" href="browse.php?entry_id=114"><img src="../img/entry.gif" border="0">.