Universal #992
Legacy number: 992
| Number | 988 |
| Original | Languages with an exceed comparative are languages with conditional deranking and limited identity deletion. |
| Standardized | IF there is exceed comparative, THEN there is conditional deranking and limited identity deletion. |
| Formula | exceed comparative ⇒ conditional deranking & limited identity deletion |
| Keywords | comparative, deranking, identity deletion |
| Domain | syntax |
| Type | implication |
| Status | achronic |
| Quality | statistical |
| Basis | sample of 110 languages |
| Source | Stassen 1984: 170; Stassen 1985: 106 |
Discussion
Counterexamples
Problematic cases: Hausa (Chadic, Afro-Asiatic), Fulani (Atlantic, Niger-Congo) (see the detailed discussion in Stassen 1985: 172ff.)
Notes
1. The exceed comparative is an instance of fixed-case comparative constructions, in which the standard NP is invariably constructed as the direct object of a special transitive verb, the meaning of which can be glossed as ‘to exceed’, ‘to surpass’ or ‘to excel’.2. Languages which can derank consecutive predicates only in cases where the two predicates in the C-chain have identical subjects are called languages with CONDITIONAL (consecutive) deranking. 3. Cf. ##987, 996.
Log in to join the discussion.
2. Languages which can derank consecutive predicates only in cases where the two predicates in the C-chain have identical subjects are called languages with CONDITIONAL (consecutive) deranking.
3. Cf. <a class="innerLink" href="browse.php?entry_id=987"><img src="../img/entry.gif" border="0">, <a class="innerLink" href="browse.php?entry_id=996"><img src="../img/entry.gif" border="0">.