Rara #136
Legacy number: 136
| Number | 136 |
| Phenomenon | verbs agreeing with subjects in person and number in non-past tenses, but in gender and number in the past tense |
| Found in | Slavonic (IE) [a family possession] |
| Domain | syntax — agreement: controllers, targets, categories. domains, conditions |
| Type | infrequentale (family possession) |
| Keywords | verb agreement, tense, person, number, gender |
| Source | grammars |
Discussion
Notes
Mentioned by Pierre Abbat, p.c. Deriving from participles, it is not so surprising that past-tense verbs should continue to show adjectival agreement. With finite verbs not uncommonly deriving from non-finite ones, especially in past tenses and perfective aspects, such agreement splits should be crosslinguistically more common ? but are they?
Log in to join the discussion.
Deriving from participles, it is not so surprising that past-tense verbs should continue to show adjectival agreement. With finite verbs not uncommonly deriving from non-finite ones, especially in past tenses and perfective aspects, such agreement splits should be crosslinguistically more common – but are they?