Universal 1096:
- Original
- There is an overall distinction between Type A and B languages, with the following correlations (i.e. mutual implications) of opposite properties defining the two types:
See Graphics
- Standardized
- (holistic) Type A vs. Type B
- Keywords
- nasal vowel, syllable, order, attributive, adjective, noun, prefix, suffix, preposition, postposition, serial verb, number, compounding, consonant, agreement, subject
- Domain
- phonology, morphology, syntax
- Type
- mutual implication
- Status
- achronic
- Quality
- statistical
- Basis
- a range of languages of Sub-Saharan Africa (Type A: West Atlantic, Bantu, Hausa, Niger-Congo; Type B: Mande, Kwa, possibly Voltaic (although there are several Type A features))
- Source
- Houis 1970: 59-67
- Counterexamples
- Yoruba (Defoid, Benue-Congo): Type B in terms of (a), (b), Type A in terms of (c), (d).Commercial Sango (Adamawa-Ubangi, Niger-Congo): Type A features: (i), (c), (d), (j); Type B features: (a), (b).Sara (Central Sudanic, Chari-Nile, Nilo-Saharan): some dialects more like Type A , others more like Type B.
Apparently, correlations are only intended to be valid for Sub-Saharan African languages, rather than universally.