Universal 1491:

Original: As a consequence of the tendency of incorporated nouns to be generic in meaning, they do not seem to be able to trigger ‘transformations’ which imply specific reference: conjuction deletion, Equi-NP-deletion, passivization, relativization, topicalization.
Standardized: IF a noun is incorporated (because it is generic), THEN it cannot trigger transformations’ which imply specific reference: conjuction deletion, Equi-NP-deletion, passivization, relativization, and topicalization.
Keywords: incorporation, conjunction deletion, diathesis, passivization, relativization, topicalization, Equi-NP-deletion, generic, specific reference
Domain: morphology, syntax
Type: implication
Status: achronic
Quality: absolute
Basis: languages with object-incorporation, including Chukchi (Chukchi-Kamchatkan), Yana (Hokan), Kitonemuk (Uto-Aztecan), Gunbalang (Gunwingguan, Australian), Onondaga (Iroquoian), Aztec (Uto-Aztecan), Tongan, Fijian (both Oceanic, Eastern Malayo-Polynesian), Malagasy (Barito, Western Malayo-Polynesian), Turkish (Turkish, Altaic), Mainland Comox (Salish), and others
Source: Mardirussian 1975: 386, Hagège 1978: 61

FP