Skip to content

Universal 15: OV ⇒ V Neg & V Caus & V Refl & V Recipr; VO ⇒ Neg V & Caus V & Refl V & Recipr V

Posted in Universals Archive

Universal 15: OV ⇒ V Neg & V Caus & V Refl & V Recipr; VO ⇒ Neg V & Caus V & Refl V & Recipr V

Original
Verbal modifiers like those for negation, causation, and reflexive or reciprocal are placed after verb roots in OV languages and before verb roots in VO languages.
Standardized
IF basic order is OV, THEN verbal modifiers like those for negation, causation, and reflexive or reciprocal are placed after verb roots.

IF basic order is VO, THEN verbal modifiers like those for negation, causation, and reflexive or reciprocal are placed before verb roots.

Keywords
order, OV, VO, negation, causation, reflexive, reciprocal
Domain
inflection, syntax
Type
implication
Status
achronic
Quality
absolute?
Basis
languages in Lehmann 1973
Source
W.P.Lehmann 1973: 48
Counterexamples
Old Egyptian (Afro-Asiatic): strict VO order, but (besides preverbal negations) one marginally used postverbal negation -w (Kammerzell 1993).
Later Egyptian has an originally discontinuous negation bn … jn (with intensifying element jn), the Coptic successor of which (n … an) could occur without the initial element, thus forming a new postverbal negation (see F. Junge 1996: 119, Steindorff 1951: 201-204; cf. also French Je sais pas). (F. Kammerzell, p.c.)

One Comment

  1. FP
    FP

    1. According to #107 (also due to W. P. Lehmann), nominal modifiers such as relative, adjectival, and genitival expressions show the reverse ordering.

    2. Cf. #441 (due to Dryer): “In SOV languages the negation is commonly placed before or after the verb” — which is partly at odds with #15.

    3. Krifka 1985: 87, concerning W. P. Lehmann’ s 1973 principle that there tend to be no intervening elements between object and verb (see #15, 107), hence
    Obj modifiers – Obj – V – Sentence mood markers,
    Sentence mood markers – V – Obj – Obj modifiers,
    suggests a more general principle: “Whenever a complex constituent consisting of a head h and a modifier m is itself a modifier to a head H, then there is a tendency for m not to intervene between h and H. Thus preferred orders: (mh)H, H(hm); dispreferred orders: (hm)H, H(mh).”

    1. May 2020

Comments are closed.