Skip to content

Universal 1584: kin terms and/or body parts > part-whole and/or spatial relations > culturally basic possessed items

Posted in Universals Archive

Universal 1584: kin terms and/or body parts > part-whole and/or spatial relations > culturally basic possessed items

Original
Semantic scale of inalienable possession:

kin terms and/or body parts > part-whole and/or spatial relations > culturally basic possessed items (e.g. arrows, domestic animals)

Standardized
IF culturally basic possessed items are among ‘inalienables’, THEN part-whole and/or spatial relations are included in the ‘inalienable’ class as well.
IF part-whole and/or spatial relations are among ‘inalienables’, THEN kin terms and/or body parts are included in the ‘inalienable’ class as well.
Keywords
possession, inalienable, alienable, kinship
Domain
inflection, syntax, semantics
Type
implicational hierarchy
Status
achronic
Quality
absolute
Basis
every language family and language isolate attested for North America (excluding only those six: Alsea, Beothuk, Cayuse, Kalapuyan, Molala, Yanan), also North Eurasian language families and several Australian languages
Source
Nichols 1988: 572
Counterexamples
In Ewe (Kwa, Niger-Congo) and Mandarin (Sinitic, Sino-Tibetan), spatial orientation terms appear alone at the top of the hierarchy as the most inalienable category (Chappell & McGregor 1995: 8)

One Comment

  1. FP
    FP

    For four languages surveyed by Tsunoda (#1592) body parts (and not kin terms) appear to be the highest on the scale.

    1. May 2020

Comments are closed.