Universal 1584: kin terms and/or body parts > part-whole and/or spatial relations > culturally basic possessed items
- Original
- Semantic scale of inalienable possession:
kin terms and/or body parts > part-whole and/or spatial relations > culturally basic possessed items (e.g. arrows, domestic animals)
- Standardized
- IF culturally basic possessed items are among ‘inalienables’, THEN part-whole and/or spatial relations are included in the ‘inalienable’ class as well.
IF part-whole and/or spatial relations are among ‘inalienables’, THEN kin terms and/or body parts are included in the ‘inalienable’ class as well. - Keywords
- possession, inalienable, alienable, kinship
- Domain
- inflection, syntax, semantics
- Type
- implicational hierarchy
- Status
- achronic
- Quality
- absolute
- Basis
- every language family and language isolate attested for North America (excluding only those six: Alsea, Beothuk, Cayuse, Kalapuyan, Molala, Yanan), also North Eurasian language families and several Australian languages
- Source
- Nichols 1988: 572
- Counterexamples
- In Ewe (Kwa, Niger-Congo) and Mandarin (Sinitic, Sino-Tibetan), spatial orientation terms appear alone at the top of the hierarchy as the most inalienable category (Chappell & McGregor 1995: 8)
For four languages surveyed by Tsunoda (#1592) body parts (and not kin terms) appear to be the highest on the scale.