Skip to content

Universal 1600:

Posted in Universals Archive

Universal 1600:

Original
If a language has DPs at all, it has DPs of type e. If it has no DPs distinct from NPs, it has some way to use NPs referentially, as type e.
Standardized
IF there are DPs of types other than e, THEN there are DPs of type e.
When there are no DPs distinct from NPs, NPs can be used as type e.
Keywords
quantification, NP, DP, semantic type
Domain
syntax, semantics
Type
implication
Status
achronic
Quality
absolute
Basis
unspecified
Source
Partee 2000: 5
Counterexamples

One Comment

  1. FP
    FP

    1. Partee (2000) claims the need to distinguish N and NP (common noun phrase) on the one hand, and DP (determiner phrase) on the other hand, and to find out.2. Default type assignments for NP, DP are: (a) NP: (common noun phrase); (b) DP: e (referential DPs) and <,t> (DPs as generalized quantifiers, à la Montague).3. See also ##1603, 1203.

    1. May 2020

Comments are closed.