If in a language the marker for instrumental forms part of the mode of expression of predicative possession, then there is a 50% probability that comitative and instrumental are not distinguished by formal means.
Standardized
When the marker for instrumental forms part of the mode of expression of predicative possession, there is a 50% probability that comitative and instrumental are not distinguished by formal means.
1. Examples: languages where the marker for instrumental forms part of the mode of expression of predicative possession and where comitative and instrumental are not distinguished by formal means: Irish le, Icelandic með.; languages where only the former applies: Finnish, Welsh.2. Cf. ##1911, 1913, 1914.
1. Examples: languages where the marker for instrumental forms part of the mode of expression of predicative possession and where comitative and instrumental are not distinguished by formal means: Irish le, Icelandic með.; languages where only the former applies: Finnish, Welsh.2. Cf. ##1911, 1913, 1914.