One generally unremarked fact is that 2nd person plurals never appear to make a distinction between a plurality of addressees and combinations of one or more addressees with non-ego, non-addressees, i.e., 3rd persons.
Standardized
2nd person plurals never appear to make a distinction between a plurality of addressees and combinations of one or more addressees with non-ego, non-addressees, i.e., 3rd persons.
Keywords
pronoun, personal pronoun, number, non-singular, 2nd person, inclusive, exclusive
Languages having inclusive/exclusive opposition in the 2nd person, e.g. Ghomala (Benue-Congo, Niger-Kordofanian) (Wiesemann 1986: viii). ??? Abkhaz (N. Caucasian) (EF, FP).Bavarian German (Simon 2000).
Cf. a similar statement by Sokolovskaja, #1453.I believe Plank 1985 (Ordnung der Personen) makes a similar claim.