Skip to content

Universal 245: free order ⇒ inflection (nominal);
rigid order ⇒ ¬ inflection (nominal)

Posted in Universals Archive

Universal 245: free order ⇒ inflection (nominal);
rigid order ⇒ ¬ inflection (nominal)

Original
If constituent order is free without limits, then nominal words are inflected, but not vice versa; if constituent order is rigid without inversions, then there is no nominal inflection, but again not vice versa.
Standardized
IF constituent order is free without limits, THEN nominal words are inflected, but not vice versa; IF constituent order is rigid without inversions, THEN there is no nominal inflection, but not vice versa.
Keywords
order, noun
Domain
inflection, syntax
Type
implication
Status
achronic
Quality
absolute
Basis
French, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese, Latin, Breton, Gaelic, English, German, Swedish, Ancient Greek, Polish (all Indo-European), Arabic, Aramaic, Hebrew (all Semitic, Afro-Asiatic), Saami (Uralic), Chinese (Sino-Tibetan), Quechua (Andean)
Source
Beauzée 1767, as interpreted in Plank 1999: 20
Counterexamples

One Comment

  1. FP
    FP

    1. Cf. # 239.2. Smith (# 241) considers this impication to be mutual.

    1. May 2020

Comments are closed.