If in a language there is a special distinction of animate and inanimate (personal and non-personal) nouns connected with a regular syncretism in the expression of these categories, then it is always the expression of the inanimate (non-personal) that is connected with the syncretism of forms.
Standardized
When nouns are distinguished as animate/personal and inanimate/impersonal and there is some (non-accidental) syncretism of this opposition, animate/personal forms will win out.
Is this, as reformulated in Standardized, what is meant? Or are inanimate/impersonal forms supposed to win out?