Skip to content

Universal 269:

Posted in Universals Archive

Universal 269:

Original
If in a language there is a special distinction of animate and inanimate (personal and non-personal) nouns connected with a regular syncretism in the expression of these categories, then it is always the expression of the inanimate (non-personal) that is connected with the syncretism of forms.
Standardized
When nouns are distinguished as animate/personal and inanimate/impersonal and there is some (non-accidental) syncretism of this opposition, animate/personal forms will win out.
Keywords
animacy, noun, syncretism
Domain
inflection, syntax
Type
no genuine implication; rather: provided that
Status
achronic
Quality
absolute
Basis
unspecified
Source
Uspensky 1968: 14 [Uspensky 1972: 68]; see Vardul’ 1969, referring to Uspensky
Counterexamples

One Comment

  1. FP
    FP

    Is this, as reformulated in Standardized, what is meant? Or are inanimate/impersonal forms supposed to win out?

    1. May 2020

Comments are closed.