Skip to content

Universal 355: (o-V-s) & ¬(s-V-o) ⇒ dominant order is SOV

Posted in Universals Archive

Universal 355: (o-V-s) & ¬(s-V-o) ⇒ dominant order is SOV

Original
In the languages where the verb agrees with subject and object, if there are forms like o-V-s, and there are no forms like s-V-o, then in this language the dominant word order is the order with the final position of the predicate (SOV).
Standardized
Whenever there is verb agreement with subject and object, IF the orderings of agreement markers on verbs include o-V-s but not s-V-o, THEN basic word order is SOV.
Keywords
order, SOV, verb agreement, subject, object, affix-order
Domain
inflection, syntax
Type
implication
Status
achronic
Quality
statistical
Basis
languages surveyed in Kozinsky 1981
Source
Kozinsky 1981
Counterexamples
Tonkawa (Coahuiltecan)(Kozinsky 1981)

One Comment

  1. FP
    FP

    The s-V-o and o-V-s orderings have an opposite influence on word order (##355, 356). In 16 languages where these orderings coexist, the distribution of word orders is middle-statistical (Kozinsky 1981).[Is “middle-statistical” = “random”? ]

    1. May 2020

Comments are closed.