Skip to content

Universal 501: VSO ⇒ Aux V;
SOV ⇒ V Aux

Posted in Universals Archive

Universal 501: VSO ⇒ Aux V;
SOV ⇒ V Aux

Original
In languages with dominant order VSO, an inflected auxiliary always precedes the main verb. In languages with dominant order SOV, an inflected auxiliary always follows the main verb.
Standardized
IF the dominant order is VSO, THEN an inflected auxiliary always precedes the main verb.
IF the dominant order is SOV, THEN an inflected auxiliary always follows the main verb.
Keywords
order, auxiliary, verb, inflection
Domain
inflection, syntax
Type
implication
Status
achronic
Quality
absolute (for Greenberg); statistical (for Dryer)
Basis
30 languages of Greenberg 1963 sample, sample of 543 languages in Dryer 1992
Source
Greenberg 1963: 85, #16; Dryer 1992: 100
Counterexamples
Yaqui (Uto-Aztecan), Isthmus Mixe, and Chimalapa Zoque (both Mixe-Zoquean) are SOV and have the inflected verb ‘be able’ preceding the main verb (Pickett 1983: 540);Island Carib (Northern Maipuran): it has inflected auxiliaries that follow the main verb in spite of being VSO (anonymous reader, cited by Heine (1993: 133, note 4));The only VO language in Dryer’s sample from Australia-New Guinea area has V Aux order; South American VO languages exhibit both orders: V Aux and Aux V, African and Eurasian VO languages show a clear tendency for Aux V order but there are cases violating this correlation. The correlation OV & V Aux is violated only by some languages from the African area (Dryer 1992: 100). Dryer’s data show that this correlation cannot be considered as absolute.

One Comment

  1. FP
    FP

    1. Greenberg considers constructions in which a closed class of verbs (the auxiliaries) inflected for both person and number is in construction with an open class of verbs not inflected for both person and number. For example English ‘is going’ is such a construction. 2. Dryer examines auxiliary verbs whose stem conveys tense or aspect. Applied to English, this includes ‘will’, ‘have’ and progressive ‘be’, but excludes the passive auxiliary ‘be’ and modal auxiliaries like ‘can’ and ‘should’. He also considers only tense/aspect words that are specifically verbal, in contrast to nonverbsal tense/aspect particles. Dryer claims that auxiliary verbs tend to follow the content verb in OV languages and to precede it in VO languages. 3. Dryer 1992: 93 suggests a similar correlation for copulas (cf. #1423).4. Cf. Keenan’s correlation for verb-initial languages: #1557; and Steele’s claim for SVO and VSO languages: #1386. 5. Additional generalization made about this universal by Steele (#1386): No language with an SVO or VSO basic order, or with free word order, has its auxiliaries in clause-final position.

    1. May 2020

Comments are closed.