Skip to content

Universal 540:

Posted in Universals Archive

Universal 540:

Original
In numeral systems with simple lexical representation, there is the following correlation:
These simplest systems parallel that of number in the noun. Corresponding to L = 2 is a singular/plural distinction, and to L = 3, singular/dual/plural.
Standardized
In numeral systems with only simple lexical representation:
IF the limit number is 2, THEN there is a singular/plural distinction, and vice versa.
IF the limit number is 3, THEN there is a singular/dual/plural distinction, and vice versa.
Keywords
numeral, number, dual, plural, singular
Domain
inflection, word formation
Type
mutual implication
Status
achronic
Quality
statistical
Basis
56 languages mentioned in Greenberg 1978a
Source
Greenberg 1978a: 256
Counterexamples

One Comment

  1. FP
    FP

    1. L stands for the “limit number” which every human language has (cf. ##527, 528) as the next largest natural number after the largest expressible in the system. 2. By the term ‘lexical expression’ Greenberg means: Every numeral expresses a number as a function with one or more numbers as arguments. E.g. ‘twenty-three’ in English expresses 23 as a function (a x b) + c in which the argument ‘a’ has the value 10, ‘b’ the value 2, and ‘c’ the value 3. A limiting case is the identity function which has the same value as its argument, e.g. ‘three’ = 3. If this is the case, we may say that a particular number receives simple lexical representation, that means it does not involve any except the identity function (cf. #530).3. The relationship between the simplest systems and that of number in the noun can be illustrated in Worora (Wororan, Australian) where there is only a simple numeral root which means 1 in the singular,‘iaru˜’, 2 in the dual, ‘iaru˜andu’ and 3 or more in the plural, ‘iaru˜uri’.

    1. May 2020

Comments are closed.