Skip to content

Universal 575: Du & Pl (exclusive pronoun) ⇒ Du & Pl (inclusive pronoun)

Posted in Universals Archive

Universal 575: Du & Pl (exclusive pronoun) ⇒ Du & Pl (inclusive pronoun)

Original
There is no language which distinguishes a Dual and a Plural in the exclusive but not in the inclusive form of pronoun.
Standardized
IF a dual and a plural are distinguished in the 1st person exclusive form of a pronoun, THEN they are also distinguished in the inclusive.
Keywords
number, dual, plural, pronoun, inclusive, exclusive
Domain
inflection
Type
implication
Status
achronic
Quality
absolute
Basis
languages mentioned in Moravcsik 1978b
Source
Moravcsik 1978b: 352
Counterexamples
1. Savo (East Papuan) (Greenberg 1988: 2);2. Yagua (Peba-Yaguan);3. Tübatulabal (Uto-Aztecan) has a dual with 1st person exclusive, but not with 1st person inclusive, at least according to the grammatical description of Voegelin (1935); the accompanying collection of texts, however, tells a different story (caveat credited to M. Cysouw);4. Ngankikurrungkurr (Daly, Australian) (Hoddinott 1988: 94) (credited to M. Cysouw)

One Comment

  1. FP
    FP

    1. Greenberg makes this claim for Dual only, cf. #1876. 2. Cf. a more specific claim by Greenberg: #1410.3. See discussion in Plank 1989: 304-305.

    1. May 2020

Comments are closed.