Skip to content

Universal 580: (gender (Sg) & gender (1non-Sg &,V 2 non-Sg)) ⇒ gender (1Sg &,V 2 Sg ) V gender (3Sg)

Posted in Universals Archive

Universal 580: (gender (Sg) & gender (1non-Sg &,V 2 non-Sg)) ⇒ gender (1Sg &,V 2 Sg ) V gender (3Sg)

Original
In languages with Gender distinctions in the Singular, the existence of a Gender distinction in 1st and /or 2nd person non-Singular implies the existence of the same Gender distinction in the Singular involving either the corresponding person(s) or 3d person.
Standardized
When there are gender distinctions in the singular, IF there is a gender distinction in 1st and/or 2nd person non-singular, THEN there is the same gender distinction in the singular involving either the corresponding person(s) or 3rd person.
Keywords
gender, number, singular, person, 1, 2, 3, pronoun
Domain
inflection
Type
implication
Status
achronic
Quality
absolute
Basis
sample of Greenberg 1963; languages in Plank & Schellinger 1994a, Plank & Schellinger 1994b, Plank & Schellinger 1997
Source
suggested by Moravcsik in Plank & Schellinger 1994a: 99
Counterexamples

One Comment

  1. FP
    FP

    This is a corrected version of Greenberg’s Universal 45 (see #520). See further Plank & Schellinger 1997.

    1. May 2020

Comments are closed.