Universals Archive
A database of proposed crosslinguistic laws and tendencies in grammar across the world’s languages. 2,029 published entries.
11 entries
| # | Standardized / Original | Domain | Type | Keywords |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 422 | Provided there is a constituent class including both topical and non-topical members: IF the verb agrees with some or all of its non-topical members, THEN the verb agrees with at least some of its topical members. |
inflection, syntax, discourse | implication | verb agreement, topic |
| 1870 | Baby talk has shorter sentences, fewer subordinate clauses, fewer grammatical relations, more repetitions than normal adult-to-adult speech, often omits inflections and function words, and the copula. | inflection, syntax, discourse | unconditional | baby talk, complexity, subordination, copula |
| 1872 | Baby talk is also characterized by: high percentage of questions; frequent use of tags; here-and-now semantics; high semantic continuity between pairs of utterances; striking shifts in pronoun use (especially in alternatives for YOU). |
discourse | unconditional | baby talk |
| 1873 | The most striking – and apparently universal – variability is in what can be called "degree of babyishness". Changes in the degree of babyishness may reflect the age of the addressee, thenature of the situation, the speaker’s estimate of the linguistics abilities of the child, the strength of the affetive bound between the interactants, and so on. | discourse | unconditional | baby talk |
| 1875 | Like other registers, baby talk or selected features of it may be extended to secondary uses, e.g. (i) to suggest the speech of children, (ii) in talking to pets, (iii) in coaxing other people or even objects to behave the way the speaker wants, (iv) in calling arttention to someone's childishnesss, (v) in adult intimate interaction such as talk between lovers. | discourse | unconditional | baby talk |
| 1902 | IF respect or social distance is distinguished for speaker (1st person) or other (3rd person) pronouns, THEN it is also distinguished for addressee (2nd person) pronouns. | inflection, syntax, discourse | implication | speaker, addressee, social distance, respect, honorific |
| 1903 | Processess of variation of the type of pronoun used in reference for showing degrees of respect or social distance are more common in address than in reference to the speaker or to someone other than the speaker or addressee. | inflection, syntax, discourse | implication | pronoun, personal pronoun, speaker, addressee, non-locutor, social distance, respect, personal pronoun, honorific |
| 1904 | IF respect or social distance is distinguished for plural pronouns, THEN it is also distinguished for singular pronouns. |
inflection, syntax, discourse | implication | pronoun, personal pronoun, social distance, respect, honorific, number, singular, plural |
| 1905 | A pronominal form used for showing greater respect or social distance is never eliminated from the system of reference in favour of one for showing less respect or social distance. | inflection, syntax, discourse | unconditional | pronoun, personal pronoun, social distance, respect, honorific |
| 1923 | IF there is no definite article, THEN there is no indirect speech. | lexicon, discourse | implication | definite article, indirect speech |
| 1958 | IF there is a great deal of ellipsis (e.g., in replies to questions or in comments on statements, or of coreferential NPs in relative clauses), THEN there tend to be noun classes rather than classifiers. IF there is little such ellipsis (and coreferential NPs need to be repeated a great deal, making some variation desirable), THEN there tend to be noun classifiers rather than noun classes. |
inflection, syntax, discourse | implication | noun class, classifier, ellipsis |