Universals Archive

A database of proposed crosslinguistic laws and tendencies in grammar across the world’s languages. 2,029 published entries.

Advanced filters
543 entries · page 8 of 11
# Standardized / Original Domain Type Keywords
1266 IF there is assimilation of fully voiced vowels, THEN there will be assimilation of partially voiced or voiceless vowels. phonology implication assimilation, vowel harmony, voicing
1267 IF there is assimilation of vowels with normal duration, THEN there will be assimilation of reduced vowels. phonology implication assimilation, vowel harmony, duration
1268 IF there is assimilation of tense vowels, THEN there will be assimilation of lax vowels. phonology implication assimilation, vowel harmony, tenseness
1269 IF there is assimilation of front vowels, THEN there will be assimilation of back vowels. phonology implication assimilation, vowel harmony, backness
1270 IF there is assimilation of unrounded vowels, THEN there will be assimilation of rounded vowels.
phonology implication assimilation, vowel harmony, rounding
1286 IF there are n retroflexed consonants, THEN there will be at least n non-retroflexed apical consonants. phonology implication retroflexion, apical, consonant
1287 1. TARGETS OF PALATALIZATION
a. in terms of place of articulation:
IF a less back consonant is palatalized, THEN all more back consonants are also palatalized.
(BACK-to-FRONT scale: velar > dental > labial).
b. in terms of manner of articulation:
IF a less sonorant consonant is palatalized, THEN all more sonorant consonants are also palatalized.
(SONORITY scale: sonorant > sibilant > stop / non-strident).

2. TRIGGERS OF PALATALIZATION
a. in terms of place of articulation:
IF a less high front vowel palatalizes a preceding consonant, THEN all more high vowels also palatalize this consonant.
b. in terms of consonantality:
IF a nuclear vowel palatalizes a preceding consonant, THEN a corresponding glide also palatalizes this consonant.
(e.g., [y] > [i])
phonology implication palatalization
1288 IF nasality co-occurs in the neighborhood of a vowel or is inherent in the vowel itself of a given height m, THEN nasality must co-occur also in the neighborhood of or be inherent in a vowel of any lesser degree of height.

Instantiations of this general implication:

IF a less low vowel is nasalized, THEN any more low vowels are also nasalized.
IF a more low vowel is denasalized, THEN any less low vowels are also denasalized.
IF a consonant is nasalized preceding a less low vowel, THEN this consonant is also nasalized preceding any more low vowels.
IF a consonant is denasalized preceding a more low vowel, THEN this consonant is also denasalized preceding any less low vowels.
Upon nasalization, vowels tend to lower rather than to rise.
phonology implication nasalization, denasalization, vowel height
1330 In every human language, redundancy, measured in phonological terms, hovers near 50%. phonology, morphology, syntax unconditional redundancy
1331 Every human language makes use of distinction of vowel color. phonology unconditional vowel
1332 A historical tendency toward phonological symmetry is universal. phonology unconditional phoneme inventory
1333 There are gaps, asymmetries, or “configurational pressures” in every phonological system, no matter when examined. phonology unconditional phoneme inventory
1334 Every phonological system contrasts phonemes that are typically stops with phonemes that are never stops. phonology unconditional stop, phoneme inventory
1335 No phonological system has fewer than two contrasting positions of articulation for stops. phonology unconditional stop
1336 IF there are contrasts of vowel tenseness, backness, length, etc., THEN there will be a contrast of height in that system. phonology implication vowel, tongue height
1337 If we define a ‘vowel system’ to include all the segmental phonemes that occur as syllable peaks, then every language has a vowel system.
= Every language has segmental phonemes that occur as syllable peaks.
phonology unconditional phoneme, syllable
1344 IF voiced obstruents occur word-finally, THEN voiceless obstruents also occur word-finally. phonology implication consonant, obstruent, voice
1412 The higher the number of principle phonemes, the higher the probability of redundancy. phonology implication phoneme, redundancy
1413 In interjections one or more marginal phonemes occur with a percentage which is characteristic only for principle phonemes. phonology unconditional phoneme, interjection
1414 In all languages possessing the vowel /ä/, the /a/ is articulated more backward (velar) than in languages which have no /ä/. phonology implication vowel, backness
1415 IF only one member of a customary phoneme opposition exists, THEN the existing member of the opposition can take over (fully or partially) the articulatory peculiarities of the lacking member. phonology no genuine implication; rather: provided that phoneme, opposition
1425 There is a tendency for languages having nasalized vowels to show more asymmetry than languages having long vowels. phonology unconditional nasal, length, vowel
1426 IF there are voiceless obstruents word-finally, THEN there are sonorant consonants word-finally. phonology implication obstruent, sonorant, voice, word-final
1427 Secondary fricatives are the results of diachronic developments from clusters. phonology target < source fricative, cluster
1428 Secondary oral stops, apart from borrowings, are the results of diachronic developments from clusters. phonology target < source stop, cluster
1503 IF there are serial verb constructions, THEN there will be VO ordering with verb serialization, one object per verb, isolating morphology, simple syllable structure, and lexical/or grammatical tone distinctions. prosodic phonology, morphology, syntax implication serial verb, order, isolating, syllable, tone
1504 Loan words maintain formal anomalies only of those types that are present in other peripheral classes of language. IF an anomaly arises from the transition of a nonperipheral element into a peripheral one, THEN there are already anomalies of this type in the periphery of the given language. phonology no genuine implication; rather: provided that borrowing
1505 IF there are anomalous allophones of any phonemes in onomatopoetic and expressive forms of a language, THEN allophones of this type are also present in other elements in emphatic speech. phonology, semantics implication allophone, emphasis, expressive, onomatopoeia
1506 IF there are regular violations of the tonal pattern in imperative or vocative forms, THEN there is a special redistribution of tones in questions, commands, addresses, emphatic utterances. phonology, morphology implication tone, imperative mood, vocative, interrogative sentence, emphasis, anomaly
1507 When there is an anomaly of stress in the appellative elements of a language, IF the language does not have fixed final stress THEN this anomalous stress falls on the last syllable of words, but IF the language does have fixed stress on the final syllable THEN the anomalous stress falls on the first syllable. phonology, syntax implication stress, syllable
1605 IF the feature [nasal] is compatible with obstruent stops, THEN it is also compatible with fricatives;
IF the feature [nasal] is compatible with fricatives, THEN it is also compatible with liquids;
IF the feature [nasal] is compatible with liquids, THEN it is also compatible with semivowels;
IF the feature [nasal] is compatible with semivowels, THEN it is also compatible with vowels.
phonology implicational hierarchy nasal harmony, hierarchy
1606 IF the feature [nasal] is a dependent of the Spontaneous Voicing node (SV-node), THEN there are prenalized stops. phonology implication
1607 IF high vowels are regressively nasalized, THEN low vowels are regressively nasalized as well. phonology implication nasalization, regressive, low, high, vowel
1608 IF front vowels are nasalized, THEN back vowels are nasalized as well. phonology implication nasalization, front, back, vowel
1609 IF vowels are nasalized before nasals that are syllable-initial, THEN vowels are nasalized before a nasal followed by non-continuants.
IF vowels are nasalized before a nasal followed by non-continuants, THEN also before a nasal followed by continuants.
IF vowels are nasalized before a nasal followed by continuants, THEN vowels are nasalized when nasal is final.
phonology implicational hierarchy nasalization
1610 IF nasalization spreads from a contextually nasalized vowel to a liquid, THEN it also spreads to oral glides.
IF nasalization spreads from a contextually nasalized vowel to an oral glide, THEN it also spreads to glottal stop, h and adjacent vowels.
phonology implicational hierarchy nasalization
1612 IF the feature [nasal] spreads through supralaryngeal segments (like in the implicational sequence above), THEN it spreads also through vowels.
IF the feature [nasal] spreads through laryngeal segments, THEN it spreads also through vowels.
IF the feature [nasal] spreads through supralaryngeal segments, THEN it does not necessarily spread through laryngeal segments.

IN OTHER WORDS: spreading through supralaryngeal segments is independent of spreading through laryngeal segments.
phonology implicational hierarchy nasalization
1613 Languages would not be expected to exhibit phonological constrasts such as [-nasal] laryngeal segments and [+nasal] laryngeal segments. phonology unconditional nasalization, laryngeal (h, glottal stop)
1674 IF a consonant is palatalized before [e], THEN necessarily it will be also palatalized before [i]. phonology implication palatalization, consonant
1675 IF one of the two tones in contiguous syllables is low, THEN a contour tone is more likely to appear than otherwise. prosodic phonology implication tone, contour tone
1677 The consonant types on the right end of the hierarchy exercise a greater tone-lowering effect, while those at the left end of the hierarchy excercise a smaller tone-lowering effect. prosodic phonology implicational hierarchy tone, low, consonant
1679 IF there is a phoneme all of whose allophones are variants of /x/, THEN there is a phoneme whose characteristic variant is /©/. phonology implication velar, fricative, allophone
1680 IF there is a phoneme all of whose allophones are variants of /†/, THEN there is a phoneme whose characteristic variant is /ð/. phonology implication dental, fricative, allophone
1681 IF there is a phoneme all of whose allophones are variants of /f/, THEN there is a phoneme whose characteristic variant is /∫/ or /v/. phonology implication labial, fricative, allophone
1700 Universal Hierarchy of Consonantal Strength:
voiceless plosives > voiced stops > voiceless fricatives > voiced fricatives > nasals > lateral liquids (l-sounds) > central liquids (r-sounds) > high vowels > mid vowels > low vowels.
phonology implicational hierarchy consonant, strength, sonority
1701 The Shell Law:
In general, a shell seems to be the more preferred, the less similar the head and (the mirror image of) the coda are. In particular, identical speech sounds flanking the nucleus are disfavoured, all the more so the less their Consonantal Strength is. The antipathy increases notably if the identical speech sounds flanking the nucleus are not the only ones within their margins.
phonology implication syllable, head, coda, nucleus, consonant, strength, sonority
1702 The Body Law (conjectured):
There must be degrees of preference for combinations of nuclei with heads. For instance, ongliding nuclear speech sounds often impose additional restrictions on the structure of heads.
phonology implication syllable, head, nucleus
1703 The Rhyme Law (conjectured):
There must be degrees of preference for combinations of nuclei with codas. For instance, offgliding nuclear speech sounds often impose additional restrictions on the structure of codas.
phonology implication syllable, nucleus, coda
1704 The Syllabic Tone Law (conjectured):
IF there are non-level tones on syllables of less than two voiced moric speech sounds, THEN there will also be non-level tones on syllables of two or more voiced moric speech sounds.
prosodic phonology implication tone, level, accent, pitch accent, mora, short vowel
1705 The Head Law:
A syllable head is the more preferred: (a) the closer the number of speech sounds in the head is to one, (b) the greater the Consonantal Strength value of its onset, and (c) the more sharply the Consonantal Strength drops from the onset toward the Consonantal Strength of the following syllable nucleus.
phonology implication syllable, head, nucleus, consonant, strength, sonority
← Prev 1…67891011 Next →